Milliman analysis: Competitive pension risk transfer costs decrease from 101.7% to 101.2% during October

In the race of meme coins, Dogecoin (DOGE) and Shiba Inu (SHIB) are the two foremost currencies creating paradigm shifts along the way. Dogecoin continues to rule the roost in terms of trading volume and an ardent community, while Shiba Inu is coming up quickly with new developments in the ecosystem and a growing burn rate. Of course, these two are the heavyweights in the meme coin narrative; however, there is one emerging player that might overshadow both of them—Rexas Finance (RXS). Let us analyze how both DOGE and SHIB are performing and, more importantly, how RXS has captured the attention of investors. Dogecoin (DOGE): The Original Meme Coin DOGE is currently priced at $0.3847, and it continues to remain robust, with a market cap of $56.51 billion. In the last 24 hours, more than $10 billion worth of trading volume has been recorded, which is more than the trading volume of other meme coins combined, creating waves of interest amongst whales and even retail investors. The bullish thrust of DOGE appears to be supported by technicals. Cryptography experts are predicting strong movement as the price has moved above its 50-day and 200-day EMAs. The ADX has augmented to the 30 level, and this, too, adds to the bullish argument supporting the current surge. The price action of the underlying asset indicates that DOGE has also penetrated the important 50% Fibonacci retracement area, with its MVRV ratio suggesting more growth points. Analysts believe if DOGE breaches $0.7350, it could very well head towards the never-achieved $1 mark, as this is a 156% increase from the current price. Shiba Inu (SHIB): Poised to Steal the Spotlight Presently valued at $0.00002406 and ranking within the $14.18 billion range, SHIB has been in the crypto investor view following a 200% spike in its burn rate. This drastic supply cut is now gaining weight for future value increases, further boosted by whale activity and ecosystem developments such as Shibarium and Shibburn. SHIB bears are steadily losing ground as Shiba Inu consolidates around the 50-day MA. Analysts and technical indicators throw a bullish edge on SHIB, stating the token will break out and target even deeper resistance levels. If SHIB manages to pass the first key barrier set at $0.000025, a potential target shift is set towards $0.000037. At this point, SHIB would have the likely potential to perform a parabolic move, leaving behind DOGE, as its movement velocity would be much larger. Rexas Finance (RXS): Ready to Lead in the Meme Coin Revolution While the media’s attention is focused on the hype surrounding Dogecoin and Shiba Inu, Rexas Finance (RXS), on the other hand, is strategically positioning itself in the crypto space as a game-changing project. Having begun its presale activity at $0.08, RXS has secured $11.26 million in presale funds and sold 188.28 million out of its total 200 million securities and tokens. RXS has utility value and a developed ecosystem. Rexas Finance is an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain focusing on real-world asset tokenization. Users can invest in real estate or artworks and share ownership of these assets via platforms like Rexas Estate. This shift of asset ownership into the public domain may be a substantial force for wider participation in elite markets. RXS makes use of decentralized finance (DeFi) components and synthetic A.I. forms to provide users with better investment opportunities and control. The intervention of DeFi allows operations in a secure and clean environment, while A.I.-enabled apps bring quality analytics that assist in making investment decisions. Such features make RXS a futuristic token with numerous real-world use cases. Rexas Finance has completed a CertiK audit, which certifies the security and transparency of the platform. Along with its listing on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko, its credibility and presence in the market have also been raised. To foster community engagement, RXS has launched a $1 million giveaway, rewarding 20 winners with $50,000 worth of tokens each. This initiative highlights RXS’s commitment to building a loyal and active user base. Conclusion: How RXS Will Take Over the Meme Coin Industry Rexas Finance is a cryptocurrency, but more importantly, it is an ecosystem that seeks to provide real-life solutions using blockchain technology. Whereas Dogecoin and Shiba Inu offer good prospects in the meme coin market, RXS represents a more advanced opportunity for investors. Through its distinctive mechanism in asset tokenization, coupled with its strong presales and community involvement, RXS becomes an ideal investment target for investors looking for good returns. Rexas Finance is ideal for all those who want to ride the next wave of crypto expansions; the difference is that it gives a real-use case token, a unique ecosystem, and plenty of growth opportunities. As the meme coin space changes and redesigns itself, so does RXS. In fact, it appears this will be the frontrunner, bringing in a valuable market for its investors. Website: https://rexas.com Win $1 Million Giveaway: https://bit.ly/Rexas1M Whitepaper: https://rexas.com/rexas-whitepaper.pdf Twitter/X: https://x.com/rexasfinance Telegram: https://t.me/rexasfinance Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp _____________ Disclaimer: Analytics Insight does not provide financial advice or guidance. Also note that the cryptocurrencies mentioned/listed on the website could potentially be scams, i.e. designed to induce you to invest financial resources that may be lost forever and not be recoverable once investments are made. You are responsible for conducting your own research (DYOR) before making any investments. Read more here.

Seven losses in a season is unfamiliar territory for the San Francisco 49ers. With two Super Bowl appearances in five seasons, general manager John Lynch openly admits the 49ers haven't earned the right to be called "as good" as the 2023 NFC championship group. San Francisco is 5-7 but only two games behind NFC West-leading Seattle with five games remaining as the Chicago Bears (4-8) arrive Sunday. "I've found the whole discussion on Kyle rather comical," Lynch said in an interview Friday with KNBR in San Francisco. "We have won four of the last five division championships. We've been to two Super Bowls. The standard here is to win championships, and we've fallen short of that, I understand. "But we have an excellent head coach, and the fact that people are talking about stuff like that, I do find it comical. We're 100 percent behind Kyle and what he brings to our organization. Like I said, our focus is really on the Bears and doing everything we can. That's where Kyle's focus is, and that's where all our focus is." San Francisco lost 35-10 in the snow at Buffalo last Sunday night and the 49ers placed their top two running backs on injured reserve due to injuries in that game. Christian McCaffrey (knee) and Jordan Mason (ankle) could return for Week 18 at Arizona if the 49ers are still fighting for a playoff spot. In a top-down ranking of NFC teams by record and playoff position, the 49ers are No. 11 entering Week 14. "You are what your record says you are in this league, and that isn't very good. So I think we've been through a lot as a team, this current team with a lot of stuff that has happened to members of our organization. Injuries, tragic circumstances, ultimately those are just excuses. One thing I can tell you is I'm proud of how this group has stuck together, had each other's back. The other thing I can tell you is the story's not written yet. We're still grinding, and we're still playing." The 49ers last missed the postseason in 2020 with a record of 6-10 that followed an appearance in the Super Bowl -- San Francisco's first title game loss of two to the Kansas City Chiefs. San Francisco's upcoming schedule after Sunday includes a short week before playing the division rival Rams on Thursday, at Miami (Dec. 22), a Monday night matchup with the Detroit Lions on Dec. 30 and the finale against the Cardinals. --Field Level MediaWILMINGTON, Del. – Attorneys for Fox Corp. asked a Delaware judge Friday to dismiss a shareholder lawsuit seeking to hold current and former company officials personally liable for the financial fallout stemming from Fox News reports regarding alleged vote rigging in the 2020 election. Five New York City public employee pension funds, along with Oregon’s public employee retirement fund, allege that former chairman Rupert Murdoch and other Fox Corp. leaders deliberately turned a blind eye to liability risks posed by reporting false claims of vote rigging by election technology companies Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic USA. Recommended Videos Smartmatic is suing Fox News for defamation in New York, alleging damages of $2.7 billion. It recently settled a lawsuit in the District of Columbia against One America News Network, another conservative outlet, over reports of vote fraud. Dominion also filed several defamation lawsuits against those who spread conspiracy theories blaming its election equipment for Donald Trump’s loss in 2020. Last year, Fox News settled a defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion in Delaware for $787 million. The shareholder plaintiffs also allege that Fox corporate leaders ignored “red flags” about liability arising from a 2017 report suggesting that Seth Rich, a Democratic National Committee staffer, may have been killed because he had leaked Democratic party emails to Wikileaks during the 2016 presidential campaign. Rich, 27, was shot in 2016 in Washington, D.C., in what authorities have said was an attempted robbery. Fox News retracted the Seth Rich story a week after its initial broadcast, but Rich’s parents sued the network for falsely portraying their son as a criminal and traitor. Fox News settled the lawsuit in 2020 for “millions of dollars,” shortly before program hosts Lou Dobbs and Sean Hannity were to be deposed, according to the shareholder lawsuit. Joel Friedlander, an attorney for the institutional shareholders, argued that Fox officials waited until the company’s reporting about Rich became a national scandal before addressing the issue. Similarly, according to the shareholders, corporate officials, including Rupert Murdoch and his son, CEO Lachlan Murdoch, allowed Fox News to continue broadcasting false narratives about the 2020 election, despite internal communications suggesting that they knew there was no evidence to support the conspiracy theories. “The Murdochs could have minimized future monetary exposure, but they chose not to,” Friedlander said. Instead, he argued, they engaged in “bad-faith decision making” with other defendants in a profit-driven effort to retain viewers and remain in Trump’s good graces. “Decisions were made at the highest level to promote pro-Trump conspiracy theories without editorial control,” Friedlander said. Defense attorneys argue that the case should be dismissed because the plaintiffs filed their lawsuit without first demanding that the Fox Corp. board take action, as required under Delaware law. They say the plaintiffs also failed to demonstrate that a pre-suit demand on the Fox board would have been futile because at least half of the directors face a substantial likelihood of liability or are not independent of someone who does. Beyond the “demand futility” issue, defense attorneys also argue that allegations that Fox officials breached their fiduciary duties fail to meet the pleading standards under Delaware and therefore should be dismissed. Defense attorney William Savitt argued, for example, that neither the Rich settlement, which he described as “immaterial,” nor the allegedly defamatory statements about Dominion and Smartmatic constitute red flags putting directors on notice about the risk of defamation liability. Nor do they demonstrate that directors acted in bad faith or that Fox “utterly failed” to implement and monitor a system to report and mitigate legal risks, including defamation liability risk, according to the defendants. Savitt noted that the Rich article was promptly retracted, and that the settlement included no admission of liability. The Dominion and Smartmatic statements, meanwhile, gave rise themselves to the currently liability issues and therefore can not serve as red flags about future liability risks, according to the defendants. “A ‘red flag’ must be what the term commonly implies — warning of a risk of a liability-causing event that allows the directors to take action to avert the event, not notice that a liability-causing event has already occurred,” defense attorneys wrote in their motion to dismiss. Defense attorneys also say there are no factual allegations to support claims that Fox officials condoned illegal conduct in pursuit of corporate profits, or that they deliberately ignored their oversight responsibilities. They note that a “bad outcome” is not sufficient to demonstrate “bad faith.” Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster is expected to rule within 90 days.

NoneThe sun may have set on that ill-fated 9.9 day trip, but Mr. Johnson's spirit shines brightly as a beacon of hope and resilience in the face of deceit and betrayal.

5 Quinn Ewers landing spots in NFL after awkward Arch Manning situation

Claros Mortgage Trust stock hits 52-week low at $6.07

Wayne Holdsworth became an advocate for banning Australian children younger than 16 from social media because his son took his own life after falling victim to an online sextortion scam. Mac Holdsworth died last year at his Melbourne family home at the age of 17 after a 47-year-old Sydney man who purported to be an 18-year-old woman demanded money for an intimate image the boy had shared. Since then, the grieving father has taken his tragic story to around 20 schools to warn students of the risks of social media. “I saw firsthand the damage that social media could do. I saw Mac, my son, get sexually extorted on social media,” Holdsworth said. “His mental health deteriorated at a rapid rate.” Online predators began approaching the teenager before his 16th birthday and his father believes such a ban could have saved his life. Australia’s House of Representatives on Wednesday voted for such a ban and the Senate is expected to make it law soon. Holdsworth said most of the 3,000 students he’s spoken to, from age 12 to 17, agree with a ban on children under the age of 16. “They come up to me and they say, ‘I’m so glad that this is going to be implemented,’” Holdsworth said. “Even the kids see it now that they’re going to be protected from those predators outside that are preying on them.” He said three girls approached him after a school address on Monday to tell him that they were being subjected to sextortion. One had already handed over 2,500 Australian dollars ($1,600) of her parents’ money to a blackmailer. Holdsworth said he was the first adult they had confided in. “The parent won’t know until the credit card statement comes out,” he said. “So it’s prevalent. It happened last night and it’ll happen tonight,” he added. Holdsworth described the government plan to ban children younger than 16 from social media as “absolutely essential for the safety of our children.” But not all parents are convinced that banning young children from social media is the answer. Critics say the legislation was rushed through Parliament without adequate scrutiny, would not work, would create privacy risks for users of all ages and would take away parents’ authority to decide what’s best for their children. They also argue the ban would isolate children, deprive them of positive aspects of social media, drive children to the dark web, make children too young for social media reluctant to report harms they encounter, and take away incentives for platforms to make online spaces safer. Independent Sydney lawmaker Kylea Tink on Tuesday became the first member of the House of Representatives to speak publicly against the bill, which would make platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X and Instagram liable for fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for systemic failures to prevent young children from holding accounts. “As a mom of three young adults ... I’m very aware of the negative impacts of social media and the challenges of parenting in this digital world,” Tink told Parliament. “I also recognize, however, that my children are digital natives and are very literate about how these platforms work. For this reason, I encourage everyone involved in this debate to ensure they are listening to the voices of young Australians when it comes to this decision-making process rather than assuming that the grownups in the room know best.” Tink was among 13 lawmakers who voted against the bill in the House on Wednesday. They were overwhelmed by 102 legislators who voted for it. The platforms have urged a Senate committee that examined the legislation on Monday to delay a vote until after a government-commissioned evaluation of age assurance technologies is completed next June. The four-hour committee meeting on Monday attracted 15,000 written submissions. X Corp. told the committee that billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk’s platform had “serious concerns as to the lawfulness of the bill,” including its compatibility with the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. “There is no evidence that banning young people from social media will work and to make it law in the form proposed is highly problematic,” X said. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the legislation was “inconsistent with what Australian parents have told us that they want, which is a simple and effective way for them to set controls and manage their teens’ online experience.” Under the bill, parental consent for children to use social media does not override the ban. Lizzie O’Shea, chair of the Digital Rights Watch charity, which aims to uphold the digital rights of Australians, said she was appalled by the process and limited timeframe the government used to pass such significant and contentious legislation. She said she was very aware of the serious risks posed by social media platforms, “but I do not support a ban personally because I understand both the limits of that particular policy and the expert evidence that is coming out from people who work in this space about the problems for young people being excluded from those spaces,” O’Shea said. Her concerns centered on privacy, negative mental health impacts on excluded children and the possibility that young children would find ways to access social media spaces that would become even less child friendly as a result of the ban. “I’m profoundly aware of the dangers of large social media platforms running a certain kind of business model that prioritizes data extraction and exploitation of vulnerability over the public interest or the building of community and the protection of democracy,” she said. Swinburne University digital media expert Belinda Barnet, who supports the ban, feels she is part of a minority among professionals in the digital field. “I like it mainly because I think many of the social media platforms as they exist right now are not suitable environments for young children,” she said.How to Watch Top 25 Women’s College Basketball Games – Sunday, December 1

The airstrikes, carried out with careful planning and coordination, specifically targeted ISIS strongholds, weapons depots, training camps, and command centers. The military's objective was clear: to disrupt and dismantle the terrorist organization's infrastructure, thereby degrading its ability to carry out attacks and expanding its influence.

Why Dell Technologies Stock Crashed 11% TodayNEW YORK — A shoplifting ring that stole nearly $2 million in clothes and beauty products from Macy’s and other well-known stores in the U.S. and then resold them in New York City and the Dominican Republic has been busted, law enforcement officials announced Tuesday. Five New Yorkers have been charged with felony possession of stolen property, conspiracy and other related crimes, Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz said. The bust served as a reminder to shoppers as the holiday shopping season kicks off in earnest with Black Friday this week to make sure they are supporting legitimate establishments, she said. “When a deal seems too good to be true, I guarantee you, it’s too good to be true,” Katz said. Nationally, businesses lose roughly $100 billion and the average family pays $500 more a year because of the impact of organized retail theft, according to New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who joined the district attorney and other law enforcement officials in Queens. The Democrat said the arrests also marked the first time anyone has been charged under a new criminal statute of fostering the sale of stolen goods that she recently signed into law to help crack down on retail theft. “This is real simple. We’ve had enough with criminals preying on our citizens,” Hochul said. “We are sick and tired of our citizens feeling they’re vulnerable to random crimes on the streets or these sophisticated organized crime rings. And we are coming after you.” Katz, the district attorney, said the group stole high-end makeup, perfume, beauty products, designer clothing and accessories from stores ranging from Macy’s to Victoria’s Secret, American Eagle, Sephora and Ulta Beauty over a roughly two-year period. The group’s leaders, married couple Cristopher Guzman and Yvelisse Guzman Batista, directed shoplifting crews to steal specific merchandise as they hit multiple stores in New York, New Jersey, Maryland and elsewhere along the East Coast, she said. They also paid truck drivers to divert products bound for retailers from manufacturer warehouses directly to locations under their control. The group, operating out of a home in Queens, then resold the merchandise online as well as at a brick-and-mortar boutique called Yvelisse Fashion in Santiago, a city in the Dominican Republic. Vince Scala, a lawyer for the couple and two of the other defendants, said his clients pleaded not guilty at their arraignment Saturday. They were released pending their next court date in January. “The charges are only a couple of days old, and I have not seen a single piece of evidence, discovery or police reports,” he said. “I look forward to reviewing the case at the appropriate time.” Tuesday’s announcement is part of a broader push from Hochul to counter Republican criticisms that Democrats in New York are soft on public safety issues, an issue that hurt her party in the 2022 midterm elections and has remained a consistent talking point for the GOP. Earlier this year, Hochul signed off on a handful of policies aimed at cracking down on retail theft, including increased criminal penalties for assaulting retail workers, new funding for law enforcement teams dedicated to retail theft and tax credits for businesses to install security cameras. She also approved policies that allow prosecutors to combine the value of stolen goods when filing larceny charges and made it easier to criminally charge third-party sellers of stolen goods. Retail theft has also been a concern elsewhere. Videos of brazen shoplifting crews rampaging through stores have been widely shared on social media, fueling widespread frustration that retail crime is rampant and unpunished. Earlier this month, California voters overwhelmingly passed a tough-on-crime ballot measure that makes shoplifting a felony for repeat offenders again. The measure partly rolled back a progressive law passed by voters a decade ago downgrading several nonviolent crimes to misdemeanors, including theft under $950 in value.

There’s no better tablet to buy than an iPad. Apple overhauled the iPad Pro lineup this year with a slimmer new design, brighter displays, and a faster M4 chip. I upgraded to the 11-inch iPad Pro from the M1 version earlier this year and could not be happier. This Black Friday, you should buy one, too, especially since the tablet is available with a big $150 discount. This post contains . may earn a commission when you use our links to buy items. I find the iPad Pro unmatched for content consumption and web browsing. Since I bought it in May, I use it as my go-to device for tackling work while traveling. This is primarily because it is easier to carry around and handle than my 16-inch MacBook Pro with an M1 Pro chip. The iPad Pro’s lightweight design makes it ideal for quickly responding to emails, checking documents, and handling basic tasks. All the iPadOS 18 enhancements further help, making it easier to run multiple apps side by side and keep up with my multiple email inboxes through widgets. Apple Intelligence has helped further speed up my workflow. Apple switched to a new Tandem OLED display technology with the M4 iPad Pro, which it claims is the “world’s most advanced display.” The new panel can hit a peak of 1,000 nits SDR brightness and delivers better colors, contrast, and details. Another highlight of the M4 iPad Pro is the M4 chip. Featuring a 10-core CPU and 10-core GPU, the SoC brings a notable uplift in performance and efficiency over previous iPads. Thanks to a dedicated 8K video encode/decode engine, editing videos on the M4 iPad Pro is much faster than before. Over the last few months, I have heavily pushed the M4 iPad Pro, running several apps simultaneously and even rendering videos in Final Cut Pro. Yet, the tablet never showed any signs of slowdown. Save big on the M4 iPad Pro this Black Friday With a starting price of $999, the M4 iPad Pro is $200 more expensive than its predecessor. Thankfully, Amazon’s Black Friday deal drops the 11-inch iPad Pro’s price by $150 to $849. This includes an additional $50 discount available through a coupon on the listing page. You can get even bigger on the 11-inch iPad Pro with cellular connectivity. If you want an even bigger display, the 13-inch M4 iPad Pro is a great buy. The best part? Amazon is dropping its price by . Bigger discounts are available on higher storage variants and cellular models. iPad Pro is Apple’s most powerful, with the best-looking display. It’s a no-compromises tablet for those ready to get things done. Gorgeous screen As powerful as a MacBook Pricey More Black Friday Apple deals: : : : : : : : : : Our favorite Black Friday Deals on gear we love: : :

The investigation team on the death of featherweight boxer Ubayd Haider has already interviewed all the local individuals involved in the fight. This was confirmed to SUNsports yesterday by the Minister of Youth and Sports Jese Saukuru. “We still have the last six people from overseas left to be interviewed and the investigation will be finishing this week,” Saukuru said. “Once the interviews are completed (compiled) and together with the findings on the (submitted) report a decision will be made.” It is understood that South Pacific Boxing Promotion (SPBP) director Mohammed Shameem, promoter Fred Chand, IBO (International Boxing Organisation) Fight Commissioner Justin Kennedy, referee Ignatuis Missailidis and a few overseas experts are left to be interviewed. Haider collapsed after his ninth round TKO (technical knockout) loss to Sydney-based boxer Runqi Zhou for the IBO Asia Pacific super featherweight title fight at Nadi’s Prince Charles Park on Saturday, October 26. He was taken to Zen’s Medical and transferred to Lautoka’s Aspen Hospital where he underwent head surgery as he was in a coma. He failed to recover and died on November 10. Haider was buried at the Raralevu Cemetery in Tailevu on November 12. He is the fourth Fiji boxer to have died from head injuries sustained in the fight. The other three boxers were heavyweight Semi Galoa in 1953 at Suva’s Lilac Theatre, then in 1975 was welterweight boxer Waisea Tavusa at Suva’s Old Town Hall and in 1990 middleweight boxer Filimoni Takayawa at the National Gymnasium in Suva. Saukuru said what is paramount here is the welfare of the athletes. This was after questions were raised on why the fight was not stopped earlier. In an earlier interview with Boxing Commission of Fiji (BCF) chairman Adi Narayan indicated that only two people are authorised to stop the fight, which is the referee and the boxer’s corner man. Saukuru said the public should expect an answer after this week. He added that at the moment there is an unclear view on how the investigation would shift as there are a lot of things that have to be taken into account. “The investigation has the power also to find some criminal offenses. At the moment, we will leave it with them (Board for Enquiry) before they make a submission,” he said. Feedback: josua.buredua@fijisun.com.fj