Big Ten could place four teams in playoff, thanks to IU's riseArsenal delivered the statement Champions League win Mikel Arteta had demanded as they swept aside Sporting Lisbon 5-1. Arteta wanted his team to prove their European credentials following some underwhelming displays away from home, and the Gunners manager got exactly what he asked for. Goals from Gabriel Martinelli, Kai Havertz, Gabriel Magalhaes, Bukayo Saka and Leandro Trossard got their continental campaign back on track in style following the 1-0 defeat at Inter Milan last time out. A memorable victory also ended Sporting’s unbeaten start to the season, a streak of 17 wins and one draw, the vast majority of which prompted Manchester United to prise away head coach Ruben Amorim. The Gunners had failed to win or score in their two away games in the competition so far this season, but they made a blistering start in the Portuguese capital and took the lead after only seven minutes. Declan Rice fed overlapping full-back Jurrien Timber, who curled a low cross in behind the home defence for Martinelli to finish at the far post. Arsenal doubled their lead in the 20th minute thanks to a glorious ball over the top from Thomas Partey. Saka escaped the clutches of his marker Maximiliano Araujo to beat the offside trap and poke the ball past advancing goalkeeper Franco Israel for Havertz to tap home. It was a scintillating first-half display which completely overshadowed the presence of Viktor Gyokeres in Sporting’s attack. The prolific Sweden striker, formerly of Coventry, has been turning the heads of Europe’s top clubs with his 24 goals in 17 games this season – including a hat-trick against Manchester City earlier this month. But the only time he got a sniff of a run at goal after an optimistic long ball, he was marshalled out of harm’s way by Gabriel. David Raya was forced into one save, tipping a fierce Geovany Quenda drive over the crossbar. But Arsenal added a third on the stroke of half-time, Gabriel charging in to head Rice’s corner into the back of the net. Our second-half goalscorers ❤️ pic.twitter.com/aFCIMffFaK — Arsenal (@Arsenal) November 26, 2024 To rub salt in the wound, the Brazilian defender mimicked Gyokeres’ hands-over-his-face goal celebration. That may have wound Sporting up as they came out after the interval meaning business, and they pulled one back after Raya tipped Hidemasa Morita’s shot behind, with Goncalo Inacio netting at the near post from the corner. Former Tottenham winger Marcus Edwards fired over, as did Gyokeres, with Arsenal temporarily on the back foot. But when Martin Odegaard’s darting run into the area was halted by Ousmane Diomande’s foul, Saka tucked away the penalty. Substitute Trossard added the fifth with eight minutes remaining, heading in the rebound after Mikel Merino’s shot was saved, and Gyokeres’ miserable night was summed up when his late shot crashed back off the post.
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol is facing impeachment by parliament after a series of shocking moves that saw him briefly declare martial law in the country for the first time in nearly 50 years. Philadelphia news 24/7: Watch NBC10 free wherever you are South Korea's main opposition party, the Democratic Party, along with others, submitted the articles of impeachment on Wednesday, responding to what the DPK leader called an "unconstitutional and illegal declaration of martial law." A motion for impeachment was reported to the National Assembly's plenary session Thursday in a parliamentary procedure that sets the stage for a full-house vote this week, according to local news . The DPK has a majority of control of the parliament, and along with members of other smaller opposition parties, it makes up 192 out of 300 seats . Thus, the coalition may only need eight outside votes to reach the two-thirds majority it would need to impeach the controversial leader. If Yoon's impeachment is passed by parliament it moves to South Korea's Constitutional Court, which must then rule on whether to confirm or reject the impeachment. The leader of Yoon's ruling People Power Party said Thursday that he plans to unite his party to block the motion to impeach. In emails sent to NBC News, Yoon's office has maintained that his call for martial law was constitutional. However, the office confirmed that his chief of staff and all senior presidential secretaries had already tendered their resignation. Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun also reportedly stepped down Thursday. Yoon plunged South Korea into six hours of turmoil from Tuesday night when he made a surprise declaration of martial law through a late-night TV address, mobilizing the country's military forces. In an address on the country's YTN news channel, he said he was making the move "to protect the constitutional order," accusing opposition parties of sympathizing with North Korea and controlling parliament. Following Yoon's announcement, a martial law proclamation stated that all political activities, including protests, strikes and the operations of the National Assembly, were prohibited. All media was also declared under Martial Law Command, with the country's striking doctors ordered to return to work within 48 hours. Yoon's address was met with immediate nationwide backlash from lawmakers, citizens and unions. Meanwhile, defiant members of parliament raced to the National Assembly building for delegation. With 190 of its 300 members present, Parliament quickly passed a resolution demanding that Yoon lift the martial law as protests erupted outside the building. Amid the mounting pressure, early on Wednesday, Yoon made yet another national television appearance where he walked back the martial law declaration. "I have accepted the decision made by the National Assembly to dissolve and lift the martial law," he said, though he urged the National Assembly to cease "repeated acts of impeachment, legislative manipulation and budgetary sabotage that paralyze the nation's functions." — NBC's Stella Kim and Jennifer Jett contributed to this reportTitle: Reinekel: Concerned that Arsenal's Lack of Set Pieces Makes Scoring Difficult; They Create Few Chances
Steelers CB Joey Porter Jr.'s 'serial killer mentality' is serving him well amid bumpy patch
Bains meets Gadkari, seeks 4-lane road from Kiratpur Sahib to UnaArsenal make Mikel Arteta proud after smashing Sporting LisbonSyrian rebels battle for Homs and advance on Damascus, Assad's rule at stake
Furthermore, Trudeau's government has been investing in domestic industries affected by the tariffs, such as the steel and aluminum sectors. By providing support and incentives to these industries, Canada aims to bolster their competitiveness and resilience against external pressures, ensuring their continued growth and success in the face of adversity.
In conclusion, while the discovery of the woman's body in the rental property is undoubtedly a sad and sobering event, the prompt response and diligence of local authorities have helped to clarify that no criminal activity is suspected. The incident underscores the need for increased awareness and support for individuals living alone, emphasizing the vital role of community vigilance in ensuring the safety and welfare of all residents.
U.S. stocks traded higher toward the end of trading, with the Dow Jones index gaining by more than 500 points on Thursday. The Dow traded up 1.24% to 43,945.57 while the NASDAQ rose 0.09% to 18,982.36. The S&P 500 also rose, gaining, 0.62% to 5,953.83. Check This Out: Jim Cramer Likes Devon Energy, But Calls Another Stock ‘Far Superior ‘ Leading and Lagging Sectors Energy shares rose by 1.6% on Thursday. In trading on Thursday, communication services shares fell by 2.3%. Top Headline Shares of Baidu, Inc BIDU fell more than 5% on Thursday after the company reported results for its fiscal third quarter. The company posted quarterly revenue of $4.78 billion, down 3% year-on-year, topping the analyst consensus estimate of $4.69 billion. Baidu's adjusted earnings per ADS of $2.37 beat the analyst consensus estimate of $2.35. Equities Trading UP Quantum Computing Inc. QUBT shares shot up 29% to $4.75. Quantum Computing announced it received another purchase order for its photonic chip foundry. Shares of Snowflake Inc. SNOW got a boost, surging 32% to $170.79 after the company reported stronger-than-expected results for its third quarter. Snowflake expects fourth-quarter product revenue in the range of $906 million to $911 million, up approximately 23% year-over-year. The company also raised its full-year product revenue guidance from $3.356 billion to $3.43 billion, representing 29% year-over-year growth. Universal Technical Institute, Inc. UTI shares were also up, gaining 19% to $23.71 after the company posted upbeat quarterly earnings. Equities Trading DOWN Cool Company Ltd. CLCO shares dropped 13% to $9.27 following third-quarter results. Shares of Pyxis Oncology, Inc. PYXS were down 44% to $2.14 after the company announced PYX-201 clinical Phase 1 part 1 data. Kura Oncology, Inc. KURA was down, falling 34% to $10.46. Kura Oncology and Kyowa Kirin disclosed a global strategic collaboration to develop and commercialize Ziftomenib in Acute Leukemias. Commodities In commodity news, oil traded up 1.7% to $70.06 while gold traded up 0.8% at $2,673.60. Silver traded down 0.3% to $30.920 on Thursday, while copper fell 0.9% to $4.1170. Euro zone European shares closed higher today. The eurozone's STOXX 600 rose 0.41%, Germany's DAX gained 0.74% and France's CAC 40 rose 0.21%. Spain's IBEX 35 Index rose 0.19%, while London's FTSE 100 gained 0.79%. Consumer confidence in the Eurozone fell by 1.2 points to a reading of -13.7 in November. Asia Pacific Markets Asian markets closed mostly lower on Thursday, with Japan's Nikkei 225 falling 0.85%, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index falling 0.53%, China's Shanghai Composite Index gaining 0.07% and India's BSE Sensex falling 0.54%. Economics U.S. existing home sales gained by 3.5% from the previous month to an annualized rate of 3.96 million in October. The Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index fell to -5.5 in November from 10.3 in the previous month, and compared to market estimates of 8. U.S. initial jobless claims declined by 6,000 from the previous week to 213,000 in the week ending Nov. 16. Now Read This: Top 3 Tech Stocks Which Could Rescue Your Portfolio In Q4 © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna has formed a three-judge special bench to address a series of petitions challenging the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, a law enacted to preserve the religious character of all places of worship as they stood on August 15, 1947. The bench, headed by CJI Khanna and including justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan, will hear the consolidated cases at 3.30 pm on December 12. The formation of this bench comes at a critical time, with Hindu groups initiating legal suits across the country to survey mosques and determine whether temple structures lie beneath them. Despite the significance of the issue, the matter has seen little progress in the Supreme Court over the last two years, even as such disputes have escalated in district courts and high courts, leading to a proliferation of conflicting and politically sensitive orders. The 1991 Act was enacted by the then Congress-led government to preserve the religious character of all places of worship as it stood on August 15, 1947. It prohibits the filing of fresh suits or legal proceedings to alter the religious status of such sites and makes it punishable to attempt to change its character. However, the Act exempted the contentious Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site in Ayodhya, where legal proceedings were already on. READ | CJI Sanjiv Khanna recuses himself from ECI chief appointment case Since its enactment, the Act remained largely unchallenged for several years, facing no substantial opposition until a deluge of petitions emerged following the Supreme Court’s 2019 Ayodhya judgment, which ruled in favour of the Hindu side and reignited demands to reclaim other religious sites, sparking arguments over the legislation’s constitutionality. Five such petitions contesting the validity of the Act will be taken up by the special bench on December 12. In March 2021, the court had admitted the challenge to the law and sought the Centre’s stand but despite the growing number of petitions, the Union government has yet to clarify its position on the Act. In July 2023, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Supreme Court that the Centre was prepared to file its response, and the court granted an extension until October 31, 2023. However, no affidavit has been submitted, leaving the government’s stance uncertain. If the Centre opts to defend the law as it is, it will have to justify the rationale behind the cut-off date and stop the reclamation of religious places allegedly destroyed by Muslim invaders, among others, raised by the petitioners. During a hearing in July 2023, the court declined to impose a blanket stay on lower courts from hearing-related cases, noting that there was no judicial order halting the operation of the Act. The court’s indisposition to issue an order came amid concerns expressed by Muslim litigants, who argued that the absence of clarity from the apex court had led to a mushrooming of cases in district courts and high courts. The origins of the current legal battle trace back to June 2020, when the Vishwa Bhadra Pujari Purohit Mahasangh, a Lucknow-based organisation, filed a petition challenging the Act. Represented by advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, the group sought to declare Section 4 of the Act unconstitutional, arguing that it barred Hindus from reclaiming their religious properties, including the disputed sites in Kashi and Mathura. The petition described the Act as an impediment to rectifying historical injustices and claimed it violated fundamental rights under the Constitution. Subsequently, several other petitions followed, including one from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Subramanian Swamy, who argued that the Act infringed upon his right to pray at temples forcibly converted during foreign invasions. Another prominent petition was filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay in October 2020, who contended that the legislation discriminates against Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs by curbing their right to restore religious sites destroyed before 1947. Upadhyay also argued that the Act violated the fundamental rights of these communities to manage and preserve their places of worship. Upadhya’s plea is currently the lead petition in the matter. In addition to these challenges, Kumari Krishna Priya, a member of the Kashi royal family, filed an application arguing that the Act was discriminatory for exempting the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute while not extending similar exemptions to other significant sites such as the Kashi Vishwanath temple and the Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura. The growing list of legal challenges prompted interventions from Muslim groups, including the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, which has opposed the petition, arguing that striking down the law would undermine the secular character of the Constitution and rekindle fears within the Muslim community about the safety of their places of worship. It referenced the Ayodhya dispute as a cautionary tale, warning that even issuing notices on such petitions could destabilise communal harmony. The 2019 Supreme Court verdict in the Ayodhya case, which granted the disputed site to Hindus for the construction of a temple, explicitly upheld the Places of Worship Act as a critical legislative safeguard for India’s secular framework. The judgment emphasised that “historical wrongs cannot be remedied by taking the law into one’s own hands” and underscored the principle of non-retrogression, which prohibits revisiting settled issues. The court also noted that the Act served as a constitutional commitment to preserve the religious character of all places of worship and promote equality among religious communities. However, remarks by former CJI Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud during the hearing of the Gyanvapi mosque dispute in May 2022 and October 2023, suggesting that the religious character of sites might need to be determined for the Act’s application, sparked controversy. Although these remarks were not part of a formal judicial ruling, Muslim organisations claim that they led to ambiguity that has allowed conflicting interpretations by subordinate courts. READ | SC sets aside NGT order imposing ₹ 3 crore fine on mining firm The December 12 hearing is expected to draw widespread attention, as the Supreme Court delves into the legal and constitutional complexities surrounding the Places of Worship Act. With the surge in disputes over historical religious sites raising questions about communal harmony and the secular framework of the Constitution, all eyes will be on the bench to provide much-needed clarity on the scope and validity of the 1991 law. The court’s deliberations are anticipated to have far-reaching implications for how the country navigates purported historical grievances while upholding the constitutional promise of equality and secularism.Unlike scores of people who scrambled for the blockbuster drugs Ozempic and Wegovy to lose weight in recent years, Danielle Griffin had no trouble getting them. The 38-year-old information technology worker from New Mexico had a prescription. Her pharmacy had the drugs in stock. And her health insurance covered all but $25 to $50 of the monthly cost. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.Down 41% From Its 52-Week High, Is It Time to Buy the Dip on AST SpaceMobile?
However, the relationship between the US and the SDF has not been without its challenges. Turkey's strong opposition to the Kurdish forces has strained relations between Ankara and Washington, leading to tensions and conflicts in the region. The designation of the SDF as a terrorist organization by Turkey has been a major point of contention, with the US facing pressure to reconsider its position on the matter.In conclusion, the decision to implement intelligent firefighting and monitoring devices in schools signifies a significant milestone in enhancing safety and security measures in educational facilities. By leveraging technology and innovation, Beijing is paving the way for a safer and more efficient education system that prioritizes the well-being of students. As the initiative unfolds, it is expected to set a benchmark for other regions to follow suit and embrace similar measures to protect the educational community.